Are Religious Philosophers Less Analytic?/ Justin Sytsma

題目:Are Religious Philosophers Less Analytic?
講者:Justin Sytsma
所屬機構:Victoria University of Wellington
日期:9/3/2017
關鍵字:experimental philosophy, philosophy of religion, intuitive/analytic thinking

針對同樣試圖證明上帝存在的論證,相較於無神論哲學家,有神論哲學家會覺得那些論證較有說服力。有人認為這顯示部分(多半是指有神論)哲學家受到confirmation bias的影響。

Sytsma提出了另一種可能性。依照他所搜集的大量數據,以及讓不同立場的哲學家做測驗的結果,有神論哲學家較傾向使用系統一–直覺式思考;相對地,無神論哲學家較傾向使用系統二–分析是思考。

如此一來,有可能有神論哲學家並不是受到confirmation bias的影響,而是使用跟無神論哲學家不一樣的思考系統。

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: